TikTok Ban

TikTok Sues the Federal Government for Forcing It to Divest From Its Chinese Parent Company

(The Epoch Times)—TikTok sued on Tuesday to block a new law that requires the sale of the app from its Chinese parent company or its ban from app stores and web-hosting services. About two weeks ago, President Joe Biden signed the bill, which passed both legislative chambers with broad bipartisan support.

In a filing with a federal appeals court in Washington, TikTok challenges the constitutionality of the new law on the grounds that the U.S. government infringed the First Amendment rights of TikTok and its hundreds of millions of users over national security concerns.

The new law sets the initial deadline for a TikTok sale by January 2025, and President Biden can decide to extend the deadline by another three months to allow the deal to complete.

Lawmakers supporting the new law had argued that it was not a ban but a divestiture to prevent the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from having access to American consumer data and an algorithm owned by TikTok’s Chinese parent ByteDance potentially influencing Americans.

However, the company has maintained that it has not and will not share American user data with the CCP. According to China’s Counterespionage Law, ByteDance must hand over data on American users if requested.

TikTok has called the bill, and later the new law, a ban.

“For the first time in history, Congress has enacted a law that subjects a single, named speech platform to a permanent, nationwide ban, and bars every American from participating in a unique online community with more than one billion people worldwide,” TikTok said in its petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

“There is no question: The act will force a shutdown of TikTok by Jan. 19, 2025,” it added.

ByteDance has said that it wouldn’t sell TikTok.

Alex Urbelis, general counsel for the Ethereum Name Service, a blockchain services company headquartered in Singapore, represented TikTok employees challenging the Trump administration’s executive order to ban TikTok in 2020.

He said that the lawsuit is essentially free speech versus national security. The federal appeals court in Washington specializes in cases challenging U.S. laws. Mr. Urbelis’s reading is that judges there usually don’t want to second-guess a bill that Congress passed and the president agrees with.

Congress obtained its national security justifications from classified intelligence briefings, as Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) explained at the Senate debate on April 23, right before the TikTok bill was passed as part of the foreign aid package.

“National security concerns are always very difficult to litigate in a lot of ways because the courts will very often defer to congressional findings and the president’s powers to conduct foreign affairs when it comes to national security issues,” Mr. Urbelis told The Epoch Times.

“So you have a lot of inherent expertise in Congress and power from the executive that the judiciary does not very often see as its job to disturb.”

He said the court would have to pit two compelling legal concepts against each other: free speech and national security. According to him, while the national security concerns are well founded, the core issues will be the trade-off between free speech and national security and whether the law had to be written in the current fashion.