Category: Posted Links 2

Crooked Hillary Calls for Americans Who Disagree With Democrat Narratives to Be Imprisoned

(Reclaim The Net)—Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has has decided to ignore the First Amendment and has advocated for punitive measures aimed at Americans who contribute to the spread of what she calls “propaganda.” Speaking to MSNBC on Tuesday, Clinton suggested that holding American individuals accountable through civil or criminal charges could serve as a warning to deter the distribution of “disinformation.”

While Clinton acknowledged the importance of indicting foreign actors, namely Russians, directly responsible for meddling in US elections, she argued that Americans who play a role in amplifying “disinformation” should not be overlooked.

“I think it’s important to indict the Russians…who were engaged in direct election interference and boosting [former US President Donald] Trump back in 2016,” Clinton said. “But I also think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda, and whether they should be civilly or even in some cases criminally charged is something that would be a better deterrence.”

Clinton, who ran against Trump in the 2016 presidential race, endorsed the ongoing efforts of the State and Justice Departments to reveal the extent of Russian influence in US elections. Clinton has long maintained that her loss in 2016 was due to Russian interference. She described these efforts as merely scratching the surface of a much larger issue, adding, “There is a far distance to go.”

Her comments also touched on the broader issue of foreign influence in American politics, as Clinton warned that adversaries such as Russia, China, and Iran are seeking to sway the US electorate.

She underscored the call for greater vigilance in safeguarding the democratic process, stating: “We are not going to let adversaries, whether it’s Russia, China, Iran, or anybody else, basically try to influence Americans as to how we should vote in picking our leaders.”

Clinton’s call for potential criminal penalties against US citizens who share “disinformation” is a controversial step toward restricting free speech. The idea of penalizing individuals for spreading information, regardless of its origins, raises concerns about the boundaries of government power and the potential for misuse of such laws to suppress dissenting views.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits Congress from making laws that abridge the freedom of speech. Under this protection, the idea of prosecuting individuals for the mere act of sharing information—regardless of its veracity—presents a potential conflict with these foundational rights.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

FBI Knew Ryan Routh Was a “Felon in Possession of a Firearm” for the Last Five Years

Editor’s Commentary: This adds more fuel to the fire that Ryan Routh is a Deep State asset. He’s been on their radar for years, perhaps decades, and fits the role perfectly as a patsy to engage in any actions they choose, including assassinating President Donald Trump.

Original Story: In a press conference held on Monday, the FBI provided critical information regarding the suspect in the recent assassination attempt on 2024 GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump. The individual, identified as Ryan Wesley Routh, had previously been the subject of a tip to the FBI, which alleged that he was a felon in possession of a firearm.

“By way of his background, in 2002, as the United States Attorney mentioned, the suspect was charged and convicted in North Carolina for possession of mass destruction,” stated Jeffrey Veltri, the special agent in charge of the FBI’s Miami field office. This alarming history raises serious questions about how such individuals are able to evade scrutiny.

Further complicating matters, Veltri revealed, “I can also share with you that he was the subject of a previously closed 2019 tip to the FBI, where it was alleged he was a felon in possession of a firearm. In following up on the tip, the alleged complainant was interviewed and did not verify, I repeat, did not verify providing the initial information. The FBI passed that information to local law enforcement in Honolulu.”

This raises concerns about the effectiveness of the FBI’s follow-up procedures and the reliability of the information received.

On Monday, Routh was formally charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number. If convicted, he could face up to 15 years in prison for the first charge and a potential five-year sentence for the second.

The Secret Service opened fire on Routh as Trump was playing golf in Florida. The suspect was spotted hiding in the bushes with the muzzle of his firearm sticking out through the fence. He fled the scene but was later apprehended on I-95. Authorities reported that an “AK-47 style rifle with a scope, two backpacks which were hung on the fence that had ceramic tile in them, and a GoPro” were discovered in the bushes at the golf course.

This troubling series of events underscores the ongoing threats faced by Trump. It’s for him to hire stout private security to take charge of his safety.

Another Attack on President Trump Prompted Prepper Surge

The Liberty Daily benefits when you buy from us. Thankfully, YOU benefit too when you use promo code “ready30” at checkout for 30% off.

The 2nd attempted assassination of Donald Trump has prompted renewed concerns over the nation’s future. Website traffic on Sunday was higher than it’s been in our history.

One does not have to be a Republican to realize that chaos may be in store for us soon.

At Prepper All-Naturals, we’re feeling the same type of turmoil and inflationary pressures as most of our fellow Americans. Beef prices are skyrocketing and we’re fighting to keep our prices on long-term storage steak as low as possible.

Whether through an attack on a president (past, present, or future) or through some other tumultuous events down the road, it is becoming crystal clear to some Americans that now is the time to take control and become as self-reliant as possible.

To encourage more people to take advantage of owning our 25-year shelf-life Ribeye, NY Strip, Tenderloin, and Sirloin, Prepper All-Naturals is offering a 30% discount for a very limited time. Use promo code “ready30” and stock up on as much beef as possible.

We pray for our nation’s future, for President Trump’s safety, and for the American people to prosper. We are also taking action by trying to put as much beef in as many prepper pantries as possible.

“Was He Tipped Off?”: Dan Bongino Explains How He Predicted the Second Assassination Attempt

(The Daily Signal)—Dan Bongino, the conservative commentator and former Secret Service agent who correctly predicted another assassination attempt would be made against former President Donald Trump, says he thinks Sunday’s shooter was connected to a larger network.

“It’s really weird that he would come in here and know exactly that spot and have a good vibe that he was not going to be detected in any kind of preoperation surveillance by the Secret Service,” radio talk-show host and podcaster Bongino said Monday on his radio show. “Was he tipped off that he was going to be there? Is there a state actor involved? Are the Iranians involved somehow?”

Authorities identified the gunman as Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, who was pulled over and arrested shortly after the incident on Interstate 95 near West Palm Beach, Florida.

While Trump was playing golf Sunday at his course in West Palm Beach, authorities said, a man put the muzzle of a rifle through a chain link fence at the next hole.

According to Fox News, the man was between 300 and 500 yards from Trump. When he put the gun through the fence, a Secret Service agent or agents opened fire.

On Aug. 26, testifying to Republican lawmakers, Bongino predicted another “incident” with the Secret Service, claiming that the agency is worse off today than it was before the assassination attempt against Trump on July 13 at his campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

“[If] you think this is the last incident, you’re out of your mind,” Bongino said.

Bongino said Monday that he was able to predict a second assassination attempt because the Secret Service has major problems with training and manpower.

“What they did was wrong,” he said. “The Secret Service has effed up again. They deserve no accolades at all.”

Bongino suggested there could be a mole in the Secret Service who helped the shooter identify Trump’s exact location Sunday.

“How did he know how to set up and where to set up, and that Trump was going to be there?” Bongino asked.

“Is there a guy or a woman in the Secret Service having a relationship with someone who is not who they say they are?” he continued. “The Iranians have been running these traps in Israel and elsewhere. …How do we know that there’s not some kind of ‘honeypot’ trap, and that some agent, or some DHS personnel, someone who has to be notified, is not in a relationship with someone?”

The Secret Service is part of the Department of Homeland Security, or DHS.

The Secret Service needs to assign security details for its protectees based on threat, not title, Bongino said.

“We do this protection by title and not by threat, which is going to get someone killed,” he said. “When is this going to sink in? After his head gets blown up on live TV?”

“Is there a political motive for the inadequate security footprint around President Trump?” Bongino asked.

The legacy media should be asking many questions about how the two shooters, on July 13 and on Sunday, could have pulled off their assassination attempts alone, he said.

“This ‘lone gunman’ thing is getting hard to believe,” the former Secret Service agent said. “Both of these shooters found holes, unique holes, from a long-distance threat in a security plan that should have been locked down [by] someone.”

“It’s Disgusting”: Democrat Strategist Accuses J.D. Vance of “Literally Inviting Attacks” on Springfield

DCNF(DCNF)—Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky claimed Monday that Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance is actually encouraging “attacks” on Springfield, Ohio.

Springfield’s city hall was evacuated and shut down on Thursday following a bomb threat targeting multiple locations, with the city’s mayor saying threat contained “hateful language towards immigrants and Haitians” and suggesting politicians are contributing to harming the community. Former President Donald Trump raised concerns about the unproven allegations of Haitian immigrants eating pets in Springfield during Tuesday’s presidential debate, with residents telling the Daily Caller News Foundation that they have not witnessed such incidents, but asserting they fault politicians for the serious migrant crisis in their city.

Roginsky, on “CNN News Central,” said Vance is “literally inviting attacks on the town that he represents,” claiming he is indifferent to threats against Springfield because he stands to gain politically.

WATCH:

“It’s disgusting because here‘s J.D. Vance who represents Ohio literally inviting attacks on the town that he represents,” Roginsky said. “They’ve shut down, I mean, there have been attacks on the schools, attacks on the hospitals, phone calls … effectively shutting this town down because of a fake meme that he admitted he had to help create.”

“And so as a result of all of this, what kind of representative is he for the state of Ohio? And what kind of representative will he be for the United States of America, when he has no problem sending death threats to his own constituents in order to score political points,” she continued. “It’s disgusting.”

During a post-debate interview on Tuesday, Vance suggested the media has only been compelled to report on the impacts of the southern border crisis because of conservatives posting memes about Haitian migrants eating cats and ducks.

The Republican vice presidential nominee also accused CNN’s Dana Bash on Sunday of implying that he caused the bomb threat in Springfield by speaking out on the issue.

“What is the implication when you say you calling out these problems has caused a bomb threat,” Vance said. “You accused me of causing a bomb threat — doesn’t that mean you should shut up about the residents of Springfield? Don’t you realize you’re engaged in basic propaganda to silence the concerns of American citizens?”

Bash denied Vance’s accusation, asserting she had been “quoting” Springfield’s mayor, who she claimed was “begging federal officials to please stop putting negative attention on his city.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

ABC Whistleblower Affidavit Drops and YES, It Really Is a Bombshell if True

Documents are being reported by prominent 𝕏 users as being the rumored ABC News whistleblower affidavit. If they are real and if the information in them is accurate, then this is a legitimate bombshell that will be widely ignored by all of corporate media.

The skeptic in me wants to wait to hear from “official” sources, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson who is allegedly in contact with the whistleblower. But everything about the document seems to jibe with not only what has been rumored but also what we saw during the ABC News presidential debate last week.

Here are the first six pages of the document (TL:DR highlights below):

Here are some of the key points according to the whistleblower’s affidavit:

  • ABC News was coordinating with Kamala Harris’ campaign far more than with Donald Trump’s campaign.
  • They agreed to not ask questions on certain subjects that would have been detrimental to Harris. The same considerations were not offered to Trump, nor did his campaign ask for them.
  • “Sample” questions were provided to the Harris campaign and not to Trump’s.
  • Fact-checks on Donald Trump were required by the Harris campaign.
  • Harris was not to face comparable fact-checks.
  • Split-screen views were required to favor Harris.

It is noteworthy that the affidavit was signed, notarized, and mailed out BEFORE the debate. The fact that everything the whistleblower detailed appears to have happened makes this exceedingly damning.

Can this turn into something big? Can this be used against the Harris campaign, ABC News, or both? It’s hard to tell. In a sane world this would be the bombshell that annihilates ABC News’ credibility and shreds the prospects for Team Kamala. Since we don’t live in a sane world there’s no telling whether this will be memory-holed, debunked, subjected to massive gaslighting, or a combination thereof.

We’ll see. All we know for sure is that if this is real and accurate, it needs to be shared far and wide.